NON-POSSESSORY PLEDGE UNDER THE LAWS OF ARUBA
A non-possessory pledge requires a deed
Security rights are an important issue, especially in financing transactions. A company may, for example, guarantee the obligations of another company under a certain loan facility. There are several alternatives, one of which will be discussed here.
Under the laws of Aruba there are several kinds of pledges, in particular, the possessory and the non-possessory pledge. In the case of a possessory pledge, the physical control of the assets concerned will be transferred from the owner/borrower to the bank/lender.
In the case of a non-possessory pledge, regarding for example registered shares, the pledge is …
Read the rest »
ARUBAN LAW REGARDING CORPORATE AUTHORITY
The Aruba Trade Register should be checked
The laws of Aruba provide that, subject to restrictions laid down by any statutory provision or a corporation’s articles of association, the board of directors of a company shall be competent to represent the company, i.e. a limited liability company (NV, AVV or VBA). In the event of the company having several managing directors, any managing director shall be competent, insofar as not otherwise provided by the articles of association (or sometimes bylaws). The articles of association may also grant other officers, to be designated by or pursuant to the articles, representative authority, …
Read the rest »
FOREIGN CLAIMS SECURED BY ARUBAN SECURITY RIGHTS
The foreign law governed claim must be sufficiently identifiable
Many financing arrangements are of a cross-border nature. For instance, a loan agreement governed by English law with the loan secured by a right of pledge governed by the laws of Aruba. This raises all kinds of questions.
Any foreign right, for instance a claim, in which an Aruban pledge is created, must be sufficiently identifiable (‘met voldoende bepaaldheid omschreven’) within in the meaning of section 3:84(2) of the Civil Code of Aruba.
Also, if one wishes to create a right of pledge in a foreign right, such a right must …
Read the rest »
UNLAWFUL ACTS UNDER ARUBAN LAW
Several requirements apply
Article 6:162 section 1 of the Aruba Civil Code (Aruba CC) stipulates four conditions for someone’s obligation to compensate damage based on an unlawful act (tort):
Article 6:163 Aruba CC provides for an exception to the general rule of article 6:162 Aruba CC: “There is no obligation to repair damage when the violated norm does not have …
Read the rest »
STATUTORY LIMITATIONS FOR FILING A CLAIM UNDER ARUBAN LAW
Five year period
With respect to the limitations under Aruban law for filing a claim, the pertinent legal provisions governing limitations are set out in Book 3, Title 11 (Rights of Action) of the Aruban Civil Code.
According to Article 310 the right of action for compensation for damage is prescribed up to the end of a five year period from the beginning of the day following the one on which the person who is prejudiced becomes aware of both the damage and the identity of the person responsible for it.
If an accident occurred on August 1, 2004, for …
Read the rest »
WHAT DAMAGES ARE RECOVERABLE UNDER ARUBAN LAW? (II)
Case law
The Supreme Court in its case law has held that relatives of a deceased person are only entitled to sue for damages against the person liable for his or her death, if and to the extent that their death has left them in need. The extent of need is measured by the standard of living of the surviving relatives during the life of the deceased. See, for example, Supreme Court dated December 13, 1985 and Supreme Court dated February 28, 1986. This rule may be considered one of the fundamental principles and values of the Aruban legal system, …
Read the rest »
WHAT DAMAGES ARE RECOVERABLE UNDER ARUBAN LAW? (I)
Nature and extent determined by the Civil Code
When considering the nature and extent of damages that are recoverable under Aruban law, the point of departure is Book 6, Title 1 (Obligations in General), Section 10 (Legal Obligations to Make Reparation of Damage), Article 95 of the Aruban Civil Code which states: ‘the damage which must be repaired pursuant to a legal obligation to make reparation consists of material damage and other harm (i.e., immaterial damage), the latter to the extent that the law grants a right to reparation thereof’.
Pursuant to Article 96, Paragraph 1, material damage comprises both …
Read the rest »
FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS UNDER THE LAWS OF ARUBA (II)
Case law regarding termination
It can be concluded from a Netherlands Antilles case regarding failed negotiations for the continuation of a license agreement (franchising) (Antillean Family Foods NV vs Mc Donald’s Corporation, Supreme Court, February 26, 1993, NJ 1993, 289), that under certain circumstances the termination of an agreement may constitute an obligation (to negotiate a renewal of contract or) to pay damages / compensation.
Possible areas of relevance are: the contents of the agreement and the circumstances under which the agreement was entered into; the amount invested by the franchisee and the extent to which the investment was recouped; …
Read the rest »