GERMAN GAMING LAW IN VIOLATION WITH EU LAW
Court of Justice of the European Union (8 September 2010): “The public monopoly of the organisation of sporting bets and lotteries in Germany does not pursue the objective of combating the dangers of gambling in a consistent and systematic manner” (click here for more).
See also my posting of 8 January 2008: ‘New German Gaming Law in Violation with EU Law‘.
Karel Frielink
(8 September 2010)
.
LIBERALIZATION IN THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN
Telecom first, airlines to follow suit
The government of the Netherlands Antilles has been in favor of liberalizing the telecommunication market for may years now. Liberalization of the telecom market means opening it up to domestic and foreign competition, subject to certain regulatory principles.
Basically, liberalization means competition; competition means price levels determined by the market, not by a monopoly. This will benefit the consumers. In a free market telecom companies will, in principle, also be more innovative, more service-minded, offering a better and wider range of services, including service packages, for example, in an attempt to keep their customers …
Read the rest »
NEW GERMAN GAMING LAW IN VIOLATION WITH EU LAW
State monopolies granted exclusivity
New gaming/gambling legislation entered into force in Germany on 1 January 2008. Although one would expect Germany to observe the laws and regulations of the European Community, it confirmed the country’s state monopolies on lotteries and sports betting and, despite several judgments of the EU Court of Justice (e.g. Placanica et al.), it outlawed any other online gambling from both foreign and domestic sources.
It is also forbidden to place a bet from a computer in Germany with an operator outside Germany whose server is also outside Germany. In other words: it is illegal for Germans when …
Read the rest »