BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES (III)

Different cases of breach of contract

Any question of breach starts with an inquiry into the type of obligation at hand. It is necessary to know more about the type of obligation at hand in order to determine whether a party has failed to perform that obligation. When determining whether a party has failed to perform, it should be remembered that an obligation may carry with it a degree of ‘strictness’, ranging from a firm commitment, e.g. commitment to provide annual audited financial statements, to an obligation to use reasonable care and skill to achieve certain goals.

The Netherlands Antilles …
Read the rest »

10
Oct 2009
CATEGORY

Legal

COMMENTS No Comments

LECTURE ON GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

BZSE law office on Sint Maarten celebrates merger

On October 2, 2009 BZSE law firm (BergmanZwanikkenSnowEssed) celebrated the merger of Bergman and ZwanikkenSnowEssed law offices and the official opening of their new offices in Belair (St. Maarten) with a lecture on good corporate governance. I was the keynote speaker and delivered my presentation in the Dutch language (click here for the presentation or click here for The Daily Herald’s coverage of the event).

I argued that government-companies should be left out of the political sphere as much as possible, so they can …
Read the rest »

05
Oct 2009
CATEGORY

Corporate

COMMENTS No Comments

BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES (II)

Entitlement to specific performance

Under the Netherlands Antilles Civil Code the demand for specific performance is not a remedy for breach of contract in a strictly legal technical sense. In this system the entitlement to specific performance is a consequence of the duty to perform a (contractual) obligation. The contract itself, and not the breach of it, entitles the creditor to specific performance. If non–performance amounts to a breach of contract, i.e. meaning that a party does not perform though it should perform, the other party may be entitled to damages or termination of the contract.

However, in some cases, …
Read the rest »

03
Oct 2009
CATEGORY

Legal

COMMENTS No Comments

BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES (I)

Failure to properly perform

Under the Netherlands Antilles Civil Code (CC) breach of contract is defined as a failure to properly perform, perform on time, or to perform at all, which failure is attributable to one of the parties If a debtor breaches his obligations there are various courses of action available to the creditor. Firstly he may claim specific performance, secondly he may claim damages, whether or not in addition to specific performance, and thirdly, he may demand dissolution of the contract, with or without damages.

The CC distinguishes between excused and non–excused non–performance. According to Article 6:74 CC …
Read the rest »

26
Sep 2009
CATEGORY

Legal

COMMENTS No Comments

THE MANAGEMENT OF A DUTCH ANTILLES FOUNDATION

Management must act in the best interests of the foundation

The members of the management board of a Netherlands Antilles foundation have collective powers and responsibilities. The management board shall be in charge of the management of the foundation.

Although not explicitly provided for in Book 2 of the Netherlands Antilles Civil Code, it is considered a general rule of corporate law that the management board must act in the best interests of the foundation in the performance of its duties, even when acting upon instructions from others (e.g. a supervisory or advisory body).

The minimum standard of care is …
Read the rest »

19
Sep 2009
CATEGORY

Corporate

COMMENTS No Comments

CROSS-BORDER CONVERSIONS AND MERGERS IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES

No outbound mergers allowed

According to the laws of the Netherlands Antilles, a limited liability company (NV or BV) may convert to a foreign legal entity provided that under the laws governing such a foreign legal entity the consequence of such conversion shall be the continued existence of the company as a legal entity – in its new legal form. The Netherlands Antilles Corporate Code also allows a foreign legal entity to convert to a Netherlands Antilles legal entity.

The Netherlands Antilles corporate Code does not permit a merger of a Netherlands Antilles company, as the disappearing company, into a …
Read the rest »

12
Sep 2009
CATEGORY

Corporate

COMMENTS No Comments

BEARER SHARES IN A NETHERLANDS CARIBBEAN COMPANY

Registered shares must be issued first

On 1 March 2004, the new Netherlands Antilles act on corporate law (Book 2 Civil Code) became effective. Since that date it is no longer possible to (directly) issue bearer shares.

A company with only bearer shares has no shareholders’ register. Only a public limited liability company (NV) may issue bearer shares, provided that registered shares be issued first and that they have been fully paid up. These may subsequently be converted into bearer shares. The issuance (of registered shares) requires a ‘deed of issuance’, which must be signed by both the company and …
Read the rest »

05
Sep 2009
CATEGORY

Corporate

COMMENTS No Comments

LEGAL REBELS ARE REMAKING THE LEGAL PROFESSION

Dozens of lawyers are remaking their corners of the profession

According to the American Bar Association (ABA), “the legal profession is not just struggling through a recession but undergoing a structural break with the past. There is a growing consensus that the profession that emerges from this downturn will be different in fundamental ways from the one that entered it.”

Over the next three months, the ABA will be profiling 50 legal innovators a.k.a. Legal Rebels. These Legal Rebels are finding new ways to practice law, represent their clients, adjudicate cases and train the …
Read the rest »

29
Aug 2009
CATEGORY

Legal

COMMENTS No Comments

THE REPAYMENT OF SHARE PREMIUM IN THE NETHERLANDS CARIBBEAN

Net equity may not be or become negative

From the legal point of view in Netherlands Antilles, share premium (’agio’) forms part of the company’s free reserves, and does not qualify as share capital. If share premium is to be repaid, the company’s financial condition should at the time allow for it, i.e. the net equity of the company may not be or become negative as a result of such repayment. If the company has shares with a nominal value, the repayment may not result in the nominal capital exceeding the net equity of the company.

In addition to this …
Read the rest »

22
Aug 2009
CATEGORY

Corporate

COMMENTS No Comments

LIFTING OF AN ATTACHMENT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN (II)

Defendant has to show that the claim is invalid

Article 705, Paragraph 2 of the Netherlands Antilles Code of Civil Procedure states that the lifting of an attachment may be ordered if it appears summarily that the claim is invalid.

According to existing case law of the Dutch Supreme Court (see for instance Supreme Court dd June 14, 1996, NJ (Dutch Law Reports) 1997, 481), this means that the plaintiff (i.e. the party requesting the attachment be lifted in summary proceedings), with due regard for the limitations of summary proceedings, should establish a prima facie case (aannemelijk maken) that the …
Read the rest »

15
Aug 2009
CATEGORY

Legal

COMMENTS No Comments

LIFTING OF AN ATTACHMENT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN (I)

Freezing assets is rather easy

Under Netherlands Antilles law any party with a prima facie claim may file a petition for a court order granting an attachment, which petitions are generally granted, solely based on the allegations in the petition. It is not required, under Netherlands Antilles law, that the litigant needs to demonstrate that, in absence of an attachment, there is a risk that the defendant would have insufficient assets to pay a judgment, as a threat of evading a judgment (by moving assets etc.) does exist.

Only with respect to some types of assets, such as registered shares …
Read the rest »

08
Aug 2009
CATEGORY

Legal

COMMENTS No Comments

SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS IN THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN (IV)

Only condemnatory judgments are allowed

As far as the form and the content of a decision in summary proceedings is concerned, the judge has great latitude in reaching a decision. A guiding principle for the judge will always be a policy of not going beyond what might be necessary or well-balanced as far as the decision in the procedure on the merits is concerned. In principle, however, the judge may order any measure provided that the measure serves to safeguard a right or a legally recognized interest.

Legal literature is of the opinion that in summary proceedings only condemnatory judgments …
Read the rest »

01
Aug 2009
CATEGORY

Legal

COMMENTS No Comments