CONSOLIDATED BANKRUPTCY
Creditors, stay alert!
Aruba, Curaçao, St. Maarten and the BES-islands (Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba) will together be referred to as the Dutch Caribbean, although each has its own set of laws.
Bankruptcy in general serves the purpose of liquidating assets of a particular person or legal entity and distributing the proceeds among the combined creditors. Sometimes, several companies belonging to one and the same group of companies go bankrupt. In principle, the trustee in bankruptcy has to administer and liquidate the assets of each of the bankrupt estates individually.
When multiple companies of the same group go bankrupt, it …
Read the rest »
INSOLVENCY AND LIABILITY
Not (or late) filing for bankruptcy
In Curaçao, there is no statutory obligation for managing directors of a company to file for the bankruptcy of the corporation. Therefore, managing directors are not responsible to the creditors for damages sustained by them as a result of any ‘late’ filing for bankruptcy. There is no such obligation for shareholders of a corporation either.
However, creditors of the corporation may hold a director liable on the basis of tort if he entered into a transaction on behalf of the corporation while he knew, or should reasonably have known, that the corporation would not …
Read the rest »
CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CURACAO INSOLVENCY LAW (part 8)
Final remarks
The receiver can be faced with a multitude of conflicting interests. Often he will be able to reach a weighing of interests relatively quickly and without many problems, but sometimes he has to balance on a thin bankruptcy tightrope. In doing so the law offers him hardly any support and neither does case law due to it being strongly case-based, although there is the reassuring fact that from a liability point of view many of his decisions should ‘only’ be able to bear a limited review.
However, the receiver personally being faced with a conflict of interest, which …
Read the rest »
CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CURACAO INSOLVENCY LAW (part 7)
Conflicting interests in connection with consolidated business operations
When multiple companies of the same group go bankrupt, it can be of major importance for a creditor of one of these companies to know how the winding up is developing of one or more of the other companies. Particularly when a consolidated bankruptcy is involved, the creditors will have to be alert. In connection with a consolidated bankruptcy, there will in actual fact be one single joined estate. If this is the case, in the various bankruptcies one single joint creditors’ meeting must be held of which all the creditors of …
Read the rest »
CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CURACAO INSOLVENCY LAW (part 6)
Conflicting interests of different bankruptcy estates
The management of different but associated bankruptcy estates can be entrusted to one and the same person who therefore is appointed several times as receiver. In this connection group relationships come to mind. It is true that in connection with different estates with one and the same person as receiver, companies not affiliated in a group also come to mind, but this will probably not often occur. Regularly, (members of) groups go bankrupt (for instance RSV, OGEM, DAF, Fokker, Infotheek Groep, Bredero, Text Lite, Mediasafe, Medicopharma, Palthe, Verto, Wyers, HCS, UPC, Van der Moolen, …
Read the rest »
CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CURACAO INSOLVENCY LAW (part 5)
Different types of interests
A receiver cannot escape the weighing of interests. Such a weighing should be verifiable. The line of thought followed by the receiver should be clear. Particularly because, apart from his liability and remuneration, these being of a different order, he has no self-interest in the winding-up of the bankrupt estate, the receiver is the obvious person to weigh the interests. If required he can and will himself be assisted by an expert. In connection with bigger bankruptcies or when a business is continued, it is for instance sensible also to appoint as receivers one or more …
Read the rest »
CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CURACAO INSOLVENCY LAW (part 4)
The receiver and personal interests
The duties of the receiver are to represent the interests of others. When his personal interests are affected he must observe extreme restraint and openness. If there is a conflict of interest or if a semblance of it has been created, he ought to withdraw as the receiver. The receiver is not allowed to sell goods forming part of the estate to himself, even if this would have been allowed by the supervisory judge (direct conflicting interest). Even bidding in a public auction he has organized is in my opinion not compatible with the independence …
Read the rest »
CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CURACAO INSOLVENCY LAW (part 3)
Conflicting interests of the receiver/advocate and his law firm
A receiver must be able to take decisions freely and be able to weigh the interests involved in a bankruptcy against each other in an objective and unbiased manner. Before accepting an appointment as receiver, the respective person must make certain that he is free to act as such. If he had been the advocate (lawyer, attorney) of the bankrupt or of his shareholder or managing director before the bankruptcy order, despite his qualities he is presumed to be unable to act as such, at any rate any semblance of bias …
Read the rest »
CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CURACAO INSOLVENCY LAW (part 2)
The liability of the receiver
The special characteristics of the duty of a receiver bring with them that his liability, if any, must be assessed against a standard of due care which has been tuned to this. This standard boils down to the fact that a receiver ought to act as can reasonably be required of a receiver having sufficient insight and experience and performing his duties conscientiously and with dedication. Knowledge and experience exceeding the minimum requirements can to a certain extent color the standard in a concrete case: after all there is nothing against taking as a starting …
Read the rest »
CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CURACAO INSOLVENCY LAW (part 1)
The receiver is sometimes described as an octopus
The receiver (trustee in bankruptcy) as an octopus: this means that in connection with each appointment he is in a way thrown in at the deep end because he has to make himself familiar with the relevant issues in a very short period and because of the number of interests involved in a bankruptcy and these being partly contradictory he often needs eight arms in order to cope with all the requirements and demands. One could just as well describe the receiver as a jack-of-all trades.
The receiver must make choices and …
Read the rest »
THREE QUESTIONS ON ARUBAN BANKRUPTCY LAWS
FAQ
Question 1
In which cases and by whom may bankruptcy proceedings be initiated in accordance with Aruban bankruptcy law?
Filing for bankruptcy may be done either by the debtor itself or by one or more of its creditors. If the debtor is a company, generally speaking the managing directors do not have the authority to petition for bankruptcy of the company without authorization thereto from the general meeting.
The pre-requisites for making a bankruptcy order on application, regardless of whether the application is made by the debtor or by any of the other above mentioned persons, is, that the …
Read the rest »
THREE QUESTIONS ON DUTCH CARRIBBEAN BANKRUPTCY LAWS
FAQ
Question 1
In which cases and by whom may bankruptcy proceedings be initiated in accordance with Netherlands Antilles bankruptcy law?
Filing for bankruptcy may be done either by the debtor itself or by one or more of its creditors. If the debtor is a company, the managing directors do not have the authority to petition for bankruptcy of the company without authorization thereto from the general meeting, unless otherwise stipulated in the articles of association.
The pre-requisites for making a bankruptcy order on application, regardless of whether the application is made by the debtor or by any of the …
Read the rest »